Legal Opinion

In Re: Dennis Williams

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 2016No. 16-13013-J, 16-13232-JPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE PANEL:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Dennis D. Williams has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Roger Charles, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. In re: Octavious WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. In Re: Antrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API