United States v. Roger Charles, II
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
The "concurrent sentence doctrine" authorizes a court to leave the validity of one concurrent sentence unreviewed when another is valid and carries the same or greater duration of punishment so long as there is no substantial possibility that the unreviewed sentence will adversely affect the defendant or, stated otherwise, so long as it can be foreseen with reasonable certainty that the defendant will suffer no adverse collateral consequences by leaving it unreviewed. In this case, we find that this standard is satisfied when the only potential harm to the defendant is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Brandon GravattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Kassir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Dricko HuskeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Al-'Owhali v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Richard Oslund v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.