Legal Opinion

State v. 1985 Chevy Pu

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1990No. 2-89-290-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

Because our prior ruling in State v. $4097 in U.S. Currency, 773 S.W.2d 674 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1989, writ denied), has effectively rendered the forfeiture provision of the Controlled Substances Act unconstitutional, we overrule our holding in $4097 and now hold that the language of the statute requiring the case be set for trial within thirty days of the defendant’s answer is directory instead of mandatory.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. The State brings one point of error complaining, basically, that our prior decision in $4097 was incorrect and asks us to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spring Branch I.S.D. v. StamosTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Houlihan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Cobb v. GodfreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Public Utility Commission of Texas v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. State v. Boren, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. $435,000.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. $8,353.00 U.S. Currency, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991
  3. $80,631.00 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Benavides v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. State v. One 1988 Nissan Pickup, Vin 1N6ND11S3JC339445, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API