Legal Opinion
Bean v. Pearson Education, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 11, 2013No. CV 11-8030-PCT-PGRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 165) and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 170). The motions are fully briefed. For the reasons set herein, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ motion and deny Defendant’s cross-motion.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiffs Tom Bean and Dennis Kunkel are professional photographers. Defendant Pearson is a publisher of educational materials, including textbooks. Between 1992 and 2007, Plaintiffs sold limited, nonexclusive licenses authorizing Pearson to print Plaintiffs’ photographs.1…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Wayne Ernest Barker v. Ben Norman and Jack BallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Alaska Stock, LLC v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2013
- Hamka v. YonanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021