Legal Opinion
Wayne Ernest Barker v. Ben Norman and Jack Ballas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 30, 1981No. 80-1288PublishedCited by 271 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Wayne Ernest Barker brings this appeal * from an adverse summary judgment in the court below in his suit for damages and injunctive relief against the two Defendant-Appellees, Officer Ben Norman of the Houston Police Department (HPD), and Agent Jack Balias of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms (ATF). Barker alleges that Officer Norman and Agent Balias conspired to violate a number of the rights secured to him by the United States Constitution; as to Officer Norman, his suit is premised on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976),1 and as *1112to Agent…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by271 opinions
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Arlan G. Reynoldson v. Duane ShillingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- King v. DoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Ed Rich v. Larry C. DollarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.