Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1986No. A8206-03404, CA A32019PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s orders in favor of defendants Oregon Beauty Supply Company (OBSC) and Lawrence Stebbeds on her claims of intentional interference with economic relations and outrageous conduct. Defendant Scott Stebbeds cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial on plaintiffs interference claim.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it shows that she was an employe of OBSC. She worked directly for Lawrence Stebbeds, OBSC’s principal owner and manager. Lawrence’s son Scott supervised…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brady v. Elixir IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Bratcher v. Sky Chefs, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sheets v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Swanson v. Eagle Crest Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API