Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0498PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Kevin Crowley filed this lawsuit against Tom Vilsack, former Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA” or “Defendant”), under the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits federal employers from discriminating and retaliating against employees based on a disability. See 29 U.S.C. § 794(a); 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b). 1 Plaintiff alleges that his employer, the USDA, retaliated against him by placing him on a Performance Improvement Plan (“PIP”) in response to his request for a workplace…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chien v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Katayoon Bereston v. UHS of Delaware, Inc. & District Hospital Partners, LP, d/b/a George Washington University HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Dreiband v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Anderson v. GarlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. Brackett v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API