Legal Opinion

Plante v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The only grounds of objection suggested by counsel to the questions which were actually put to the witness and answered were (1) that the fact sought to be proved was immaterial and (2) that the answers might involve hearsay. The only formal objection made was based upon the second ground.

After the third question had been answered by the witness, another objection was made, evidently in anticipation of further examination along the same line, that the proper way to prove a conviction was by a court record. This objection was obviously prospective in its purpose and operation as indicated by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. Dover, Somersworth & Rochester Street Ry.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  2. State v. IsabelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  3. Monteith v. Manchester Rendering Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CassellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API