Monteith v. Manchester Rendering Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff was an epileptic, and the defendant excepted to the instruction that its knowledge of the plaintiff’s disease was a circumstance in the light of which its conduct in furnishing a place for him to work was to be judged. Whether the plaintiff had an attack of his disease at the time he was hurt was an issue submitted to the jury without objection, and the defendant’s position here taken that there was no evidence of the .plaintiff’s suffering from an attack when hurt may not be maintained. The non-objection to the submission of the issue was a consent to it, and the implied ruling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bourassa v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Gardner v. Commercial MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Morrison v. NooneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
- Lindell v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Reed v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCorstin v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Plante v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Sweeney v. WinebaumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930