Legal Opinion

Forristall v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-11454PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEARNS, District Judge.

The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff John Forristall III, the non-movant, are as follows. Forristall was a longtime, and by all accounts, successful employee of defendant Federal Express Corporation (Fedex). In January of 2003, Forristall and his then-wife Mary divorced. The Divorce Judgment Nisi required For-ristall, inter alia, to

maintain his present group medical insurance policy, (Cigna), or its equivalent ... for MARY for so long as she is able to be covered at no additional cost…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Pens. Plan Guide P 23907e Victor E. Carlo, Jr. And Kathleen M. Carlo v. Reed Rolled Thread Die CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farias v. Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare FundDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API