Legal Opinion
Weirich v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 18, 1974No. 74-2310PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Petitioner, appearing pro se as he did below, appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board which held he was disqualified under ORS 657.-176 (1)① from receiving unemployment benefits be*481cause he was discharged for “misconduct connected with his work.” We interpret his assignments of error as raising three basic contentions: (I) the pertinent language in ORS 657.176 (2) (a), “misconduct connected with his work,” is void for vagueness; (II) assuming that the statutory language is sufficiently definite, there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of misconduct; and (III)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Portland v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Palen v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Schock v. Bd. of Rev., Div. Empl. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lundy v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Lundy v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978