Amber Vanlier Phillips v. Westinghouse Electric Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMBER VANLIER PHILLIPS, 2:25-CV-01081-CCW Plaintiff, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Westinghouse Electric Company’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Amber Vanlier Phillips’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 12. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Westinghouse’s Motion. I. Background This employment discrimination case arises out of Ms. Phillips’ former employment with Westinghouse. The relevant factual allegations, taken as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.