Legal Opinion
In Re Hines
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 2005No. 01-BG-1558, 04-BG-166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
On November 16, 2001, the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspended the respondent, Jeffrey C. Hines, from the practice of law with the right to apply for readmission after six months. That suspension was imposed after an evidentiary hearing where Mr. Hines was found to have violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7 (conflict of interest) and 5.1(c) (supervisory attorney’s responsibilities). 2
On January 14, 2002, this court temporarily suspended Mr. Hines pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) for its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MidlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- In Re MaignanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re WeaverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008