Legal Opinion
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 13, 2010No. Case 10-CV-02176-LHKPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Chaim Kowalsky’s First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The Court heard oral argument on November 23, 2010. Having considered the parties’ submissions and arguments, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. Background
This case arises out of the marketing and sale of allegedly defective HP Office Jet Pro All-in-One printers of the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Moore v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Herron v. Best Buy Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Sciacca v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.