Legal Opinion

United States v. Supreme Court of New Mexico

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2016No. 14-2037 & 14-2049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

New Mexico Rule of Professional Conduct 16-308(E) (“Rule 16-308(E)”) prohibits a prosecutor from subpoenaing a lawyer to present evidence about a past or present client in a grand-jury or other criminal proceeding unless such evidence is “essential” and “there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.” In a lawsuit brought against the New Mexico Supreme Court, and the state’s Disciplinary Board and Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“Defendants”), the United States claims that the enforcement of this rule against federal prosecutors licensed in New Mexico…

2Cases cited153 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martinez v. City of Rio RanchoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  2. Cromwell v. KobachDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API