Legal Opinion

Terwilliger v. Steenburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered April 21, 2005 in Ulster County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon.

Plaintiffs and defendants Jerry Van Steenburg and Mary Van Steenburg (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants) are the owners of neighboring parcels of real property located in the Town of Rochester, Ulster County. The parties’ respective properties may be traced to a common grantor, Barney Rothberg. In 1982, Rothberg subdivided his land into several parcels as depicted on a map…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witter v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hopper v. FrieryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Kingsland v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Higgins v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Fekishazy v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bekkering v. ChristianaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Camp Bearberry, LLC v. KhannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Cannon v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Pepe v. Antlers of Raquette Lake, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Village of Philadelphia v. FortisUs Energy Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API