Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1984No. JM-180Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Attorney General of Texas Lily 5, 1984 JIM MATTOX Attorney General Suprem cwrl SulldlnQ Booorable Fred M. Ba,xker opinion, no. ~~- 180 P. 0. Box 11548 Parker county Attorcey Auslln. TX. 7S71I. 2!m 512l4752661 County Courthouse Be: Whether an auxiliary county Telex 81a674.1367 Weatherford. Texar 76086 courthoure 10 subject to city telecopier 612l476.0266 zoning ordinances 714 Jackson.Sulle 700 Dear Mr. Barker: Dallas. TX. 75202ao6 214i742+.Q44 You ask whether Parker County’s uee of a tract of land for an auxiliary courthoum! within the city limits of the county seat la eubject to ,the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Port Arthur Independent School District v. City of GrovesTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Porter v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Wilkinsburg-Penn Joint Water Authority v. Churchill BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Pal-Mar Water Management Dist. v. MARTIN CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API