Legal Opinion

Port Arthur Independent School District v. City of Groves

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1964No. A-9570PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIAMILTON, Justice.

Petitioner, Port Arthur Independent School District, is a duly organized district under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of Texas. Respondent, the City of Groves, is a home rule municipality located in Jefferson County, Texas. Petitioner owns certain real property located within the geographical confines of the respondent city, and in accordance with the constitution and statutes of the State of Texas ascertained the necessity for the construction of an elementary school on such property. When such construction project began, the respondent asserted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Pasadena Sch. Dist. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Milwaukee v. McGregorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kentucky Institution for Blind v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  5. Kansas City v. School Dist. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. School District v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Texas Midstream Gas Services, LLC v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Hazleton Area School District v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Austin Independent School District v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API