Legal Opinion

Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 29, 1972No. 8325PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

The presented issue is whether on abstract principle a public utility’s power of eminent domain is superior to the zoning ordinance of a home-rule city. We hold that it is not, and this determination requires a reversal of the trial court’s judgment of dismissal.

Appellee Southwestern Public Service Company, hereinafter referred to as SPS, was granted a building permit by the City of Amarillo, a home-rule city. SPS purchased a tract of land in an area of the city zoned for single family dwellings, and started construction of an electrical substation thereon. When the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Port Arthur Independent School District v. City of GrovesTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Texas Midstream Gas Services, LLC v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Klein Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Austin v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Forsyth County v. Georgia Transmission Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API