Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
The presented issue is whether on abstract principle a public utility’s power of eminent domain is superior to the zoning ordinance of a home-rule city. We hold that it is not, and this determination requires a reversal of the trial court’s judgment of dismissal.
Appellee Southwestern Public Service Company, hereinafter referred to as SPS, was granted a building permit by the City of Amarillo, a home-rule city. SPS purchased a tract of land in an area of the city zoned for single family dwellings, and started construction of an electrical substation thereon. When the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Port Arthur Independent School District v. City of GrovesTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3Cited by20 opinions
- Texas Midstream Gas Services, LLC v. City of Grand PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Klein Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Austin v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Forsyth County v. Georgia Transmission Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.