Legal Opinion

Drydock Coal Co. v. Ohio Division of Reclamation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1996No. 95 CA 1668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peter B. Abele, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Ohio Reclamation Board of Review denying a request by Drydock Coal Company, Inc., appellant herein, to remove from an approved coal strip-mining application a condition that bars appellant from mining within three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling.

Appellant assigns the following error:

“The Reclamation Board of Review erred in affirming the decision of the Chief of the Division of Reclamation, which imposed a condition to permit application No. 1289, which precludes mining in the permit area within three hundred feet…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. James A. Keller, Inc. v. FlahertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gemmell v. AnthonyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Interstate Properties v. Schregardus, Unpublished Decision (12-30-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API