Legal Opinion
Drydock Coal Co. v. Ohio Division of Reclamation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1996No. 95 CA 1668PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peter B. Abele, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Ohio Reclamation Board of Review denying a request by Drydock Coal Company, Inc., appellant herein, to remove from an approved coal strip-mining application a condition that bars appellant from mining within three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling.
Appellant assigns the following error:
“The Reclamation Board of Review erred in affirming the decision of the Chief of the Division of Reclamation, which imposed a condition to permit application No. 1289, which precludes mining in the permit area within three hundred feet…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- James A. Keller, Inc. v. FlahertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gemmell v. AnthonyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Interstate Properties v. Schregardus, Unpublished Decision (12-30-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999