Legal Opinion

Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1974No. 74-121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of appellant-third party defendant to dismiss on the grounds of improper venue. See, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Company, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 237; United States v. Acord, 10 Cir. 1954, 209 F.2d 709, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 975, 74 S.Ct. 786, 98 L.Ed. 1115; McGrath v. Lund’s Fisheries, D.Del.1959, 170 F. Supp. 173; 6 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 1445 (1971); 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Section 14.28(2), (2nd ed. 1974).

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial MacHinery Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. McGrath v. Lund's Fisheries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. San Marco Cont. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat WorksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API