Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of appellant-third party defendant to dismiss on the grounds of improper venue. See, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Company, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 237; United States v. Acord, 10 Cir. 1954, 209 F.2d 709, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 975, 74 S.Ct. 786, 98 L.Ed. 1115; McGrath v. Lund’s Fisheries, D.Del.1959, 170 F. Supp. 173; 6 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 1445 (1971); 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Section 14.28(2), (2nd ed. 1974).
Affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial MacHinery Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- McGrath v. Lund's Fisheries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. San Marco Cont. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat WorksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978