Legal Opinion

Coastal Power Products, Inc. v. Daytona Marina & Boat Works

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 1978No. HH-416Published

1Per curiam

Coastal Power, a third party defendant, seeks interlocutory review from the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of venue. The order is affirmed, there having been no manifest inconvenience, and therefore abuse of discretion, shown. State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. San Marco Contracting Company, 355 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Co., 263 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Mosby and Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Company of Florida, 299 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Keller Building Products of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial MacHinery Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. San Marco Cont. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API