Legal Opinion

Pope v. Popow

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1965No. 8206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff to set •aside a transfer of certain lots described in the complaint as Lots 17 to 35, inclusive, of the Southeast Quarter (SEJ4) of Section 26, Township 155, Range 83, which lots the ■defendant Clarence Pope transferred to his parents, the defendants Plarry Popow and Agnes Popow; and for other relief. The ■case was tried to the court without a jury. At the close of the trial, the defend.ants moved for a dismissal of the plaintiff’s action. Thereafter, the trial court issued ■its memorandum opinion dismissing the ■plaintiff’s complaint. No…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. First National Bank v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Mills v. RoggensackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ripplinger v. OTTEMNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Harding v. LaneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krise v. GillundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Trengen v. MongeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Collette v. MatejcekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fettig v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vogel v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API