Legal Opinion

Local Inv. Co. v. Humes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1915No. 4523PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by the Locál Investment Company, a corporation, against Ella Humes and another. Judgment f6r defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

The plaintiff in error, a domestic corporation, on September 15, 1911, commenced this action against defendants in error on a note for the principal sum of $800, with interest thereon, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage securing the same, which note and mortgage plaintiff held as transferee for value from T. H. Byrd, to whom defendants had executed the same on December 3, 1908.

The said real estate is described in the petition and mortgage as the S. E. Yi of the S. E. % of section 23, township 27 N., range 20 E., and N. ]/2 of N. E. 44 of . N. E. 1/4, and S. E. 44 of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Fowler v. Scully ex rel. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  4. Louisville School Board v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Hanson v. Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Texas Co. v. State ex rel. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Simler v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Foster v. Augustanna College & Theological SeminarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Laffranchini v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API