Legal Opinion

Varela v. Investors Insurance Holding Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1993PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Defendant law firm represented defendant Investors, an insurance company. The company erroneously believed that plaintiffs were delinquent in paying their insurance premiums and consequently, the law firm commenced a collection action and entered a default judgment against plaintiffs for the sum believed due. Although thereafter informed by their client that a mistake had been made and that plaintiffs did not owe Investors the premium, defendant refused to enter a satisfaction of judgment until…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CONew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Conboy v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API