Legal Opinion
Tektel, Inc. v. Maier
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 25, 1992No. 92 C 5965PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Tektel, Inc. (“Tektel”), has brought this action against Howard S. Mai-er (“Maier”) seeking payment allegedly due on a secured promissory note. Defendant Maier has raised affirmative defenses and filed a four-count counterclaim against Tektel. Tektel now moves to strike portions of Maier’s Answer and to dismiss the defendant’s counterclaim in its entirety. For the reasons set forth below, we deny plaintiff’s motion to strike, grant his motion to dismiss paragraph 7(b) of Count II, and deny his motion to dismiss other portions of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Dan Beraha, M.D. v. Baxter Health Care CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berke v. Presstek, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Burke v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Berke, et al. v. Presstek, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. v. City of West FrankfortDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.