Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1983No. 8219SC1043PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

I. Defendant Gonzalez’s Appeal.

Defendant Gonzalez first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State’s motion to consolidate for trial the charges against the three defendants and in denying Gonzalez’s motion to sever. He argues separate trials for each defendant were necessary because the statement made by codefendant Crawford implicated the others.

G.S. 15A-926(b) provides for joinder of defendants for trial when the several offenses were part of a common scheme or plan, or part of the same act or transaction, or were so closely connected in time, place and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API