Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1923No. 25561PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the WHOLE COURT.

PROVOSTX, C. J.

Havihg come to the conclusion that the judgment of., the Court of Appeal is correct in this case, we affirm it, and adopt as our own the reasons therefor as follows:

“Charles F. Claiborne, Judge. The succession of Emma Williams Martin was opened in the civil district court, under the No. 105354, and was allotted to division E. P. J..Flanagan was appointed administrator.
“Flanagan brought suit against the Land Development Company to annul a tax sale of certain property owned by Emma Williams. This suit was allotted to division A of the civil district court and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bossier's Heirs v. Hollingsworth & JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Laroussini v. WerleinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. Vance v. NoelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  5. Durham v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People of Living God v. Chantilly CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Feitel v. FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Grusich v. GrusichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Nicholson v. Holloway Planting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Lerner v. BischoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API