Legal Opinion

Bossier's Heirs v. Hollingsworth & Jackson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 18, 1906No. 15,983PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Eleventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Natchitoches; Charles Vernon Porter, Judge. Action by the heirs of Francois Bossier against Hollingsworth & Jackson. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

MONROE, J.

This proceeding was originally dismissed by the judge a quo as in case of nonsuit. On appeal to this court, it was, held that the action was not possessory, nor petitory, nor an action of jactitation, nor, strictly, an action of trespass, and the judgment of nonsuit was set aside and the case remanded in order to enable plaintiffs to set forth their cause of action more distinctly.

Thereupon, they filed an amended petition, to which defendants excepted: (1) That it disclosed no cause of action; (2) that the allegations of possession were vague, indefinite, ambiguous, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pflug v. Judge of Division ESupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Fields v. GagnéSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Ikerd v. Judge of the Eighth District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Harris v. StockettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Reeves v. BarbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Feitel v. FeitelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Jeansonne v. WillieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Loew's, Inc. v. Don George, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Trcka v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API