Legal Opinion
Lerner v. Bischoff
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1940No. 17211PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the trial court which dismissed his suit on the defendants’ plea of res ad-judicata. The plea is based upon the following state of facts:
On August 11, 1933, plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants in the First City Court of New Orleans, seeking judgment in the sum of $225 with interest. He alleged. that the defendants are the heirs of one Leon Bischoff, deceased; that they had accepted the succession of Bischoff purely, simply and unconditionally; that on September 15, 1930, he had loaned the sum of $300 to Bischoff; that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Laenger v. LaengerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Plicque & Lebeau v. PerretSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Succession of HerberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Buck v. BlairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Penouilh v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNeal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Bologna Brothers v. MorrisseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Oak Appliance Co. v. ClaytonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Succession of HeckertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Veazey v. RogersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942