Legal Opinion

Gladwin v. Ames

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1903No. 4319PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Geoege W. Belt, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The statement of this case is found in 26 Wash. 272 (66 Pac. 391). The question at issue was the legality of certain warrants issued by the town of Cheney; the record showing that at the time of the issue of the warrants the municipality exceeded the limit of its indebtedness under the constitutional limitation of one and one-half per centum, and that no election had been held to validate any of the indebtedness. It was decided in that case that the rule announced by this court in Rauch v. Chapman, 16 Wash. 568 (48 Pac. 253, 36 L. R. A. 407,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hull v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Village of Kenmore v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API