Legal Opinion

Duryee v. Friars

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1897No. 2775PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.—Hon. Prank T. Reid, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the county commissioners of Snohomish county from issuing the bonds of such county for the purpose of exchanging the same for its outstanding warrants aggregating some $130,-000. A trial was had and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

The plaintiff contends that the judgment should be affirmed for two reasons, one being that the act authorizing the issuance of such bonds (Laws 1895, p. 465), provides in section 3 (Bal. Code, § 1892) that before any bonds shall be issued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State ex rel. Jones v. McGrawWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Porter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hull v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API