State v. Davis

THAYER, j.

The defendant, Raymond E. Davis, appeals his convictions on two counts of theft by unauthorized taking or transfer, see RSA 637:3 (1996), and two counts of theft by misapplication of property, see RSA 637:10 (1996). He argues that: (1) the Superior Court {Barry, J.) erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict based upon newly discovered evidence; and (2) the Superior Court {Gray, J.) erred in failing to voir dire prospective jurors about the presumption of innocence. We affirm.

The following facts were adduced at trial. The defendant served as the executive vice-president of…