Legal Opinion

State v. Skidmore

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1993No. 92-728PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

After a jury trial in Superior Court (Nadeau, J.), the defendant, John Skidmore, was convicted of one count of forgery, RSA 638:1 (1986 & Supp. 1992), and one count of receiving stolen property, RSA 637:7 (1986). He appeals his convictions, arguing: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a prior conviction pursuant to New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 609(a); and (2) the trial court’s admission of this evidence without a limiting instruction so prejudiced his case that he is entitled to a new trial. We reverse based upon the defendant’s second argument and, thus, do…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. State v. RuelkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. State v. HunterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. State v. BrodowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. BruceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MinorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. State v. LaurieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. State v. DupontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API