Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Alexander

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Trover by James G. Gordon against Joseph C. Alexander. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in trover. The declaration contained a count claiming special damages for injury to his business and credit because defendant unlawfully took his goods froth him. He recovered a judgment of upwards of $1,800. The charge of the court contains a statement of the claims of the respective parties, and is as follows:

“Previous to November 12, 1891, Alexander McDonald *108had been engaged in the mercantile business at Tyre, in this county, — general merchandise. At that date he was largely indebted, and on that date he made a sale of his entire business to the plaintiff in this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dixon v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Woods v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hough v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Cortland Manufacturing Co. v. PlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. L. Starks Co. v. EppinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API