Legal Opinion

Soto v. County of Riverside

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 2008No. E042725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ P. J.

Defendant County of Riverside (County) challenges the trial court’s judgment after an order granting plaintiff Jose Soto’s (Soto) motion for summary judgment on a writ of mandate. The judgment (1) declares unconstitutional the provision in a memorandum of understanding requiring a disciplined employee to pay for half of the hearing costs for an administrative appeal if the employee pursues the appeal through privately retained counsel rather than through the union; (2) orders the County to provide all employees who appeal disciplinary actions under the memorandum of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. California Teachers Assn. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Armstrong v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gramercy Investment Trust v. Lakemont Homes Nevada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. B.H. v. County of San Bernardino CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Stephen (Rex) Sanders, et al. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API