Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Meyers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1992No. 91-55101PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Norman Armstrong filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging he was discharged from his job at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) without due process. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm.
I
The University fired Armstrong, an employee in its Mail and Messenger Service department, because he was unable to perform his duties for medical reasons. Armstrong requested a hearing to contest his termination but was told his only recourse was the grievance/arbitration procedure established by the collective bargaining agreement between UCLA and his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Flint v. DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Pedro Leonardo Mascheroni v. Board of Regents of the University of California, University of California, Los Alamos National LaboratoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Cushing v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.