Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 2001No. COA00-308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Judge.

This appeal arises out of the trial court’s denial of defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his person pursuant to a search warrant. Based on the reasoning herein, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

The defendant, William Dreyshall Johnson, was indicted on 1 June 1999 for felonious possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine, and maintaining a dwelling for keeping and selling cocaine. On 24 May 1999 he filed a motion to suppress physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The motion to suppress was denied, and on 9 November 1999…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. State v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API