Legal Opinion
Ruppert v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1963No. Civ. 10448PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Defendant Ruth E. Jackson (hereinafter “Seller”) appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs Ruppert (hereinafter “Buyers”) decreeing specific performance of a contract of sale of real property.
Buyers by their complaint sued upon a “deposit receipt” which they alleged constituted an agreement by which Seller agreed to sell certain real property to them for $32,500. They alleged that they had offered to perform but Seller refused to convey. Seller’s amended answer denied the existence of the contract. It particularized by alleging that certain named realtors and the firm by whom they were employed,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lewetzow v. SapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Calloway v. DownieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.