Legal Opinion
Yelin v. Carvel Corp.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1995No. 21513PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Defendants-Appellants, Kenneth and Jacqueline Yelin (the Yelins), appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their third-party complaint against Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee, Carvel Corporation (Carvel). The district court held that the third-party complaint was improperly filed under SCRA 1986, 1-014(A). We affirm.
FACTS
Carvel is in the business of licensing individuals to manufacture and sell ice cream and frozen dessert products under the Carvel name. In December 1986 the Yelins entered into a franchise agreement with Carvel to sell ice cream products in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. OlavarrietaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Tipton v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- New Mexico Public Schools Insurance Authority v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Budget Rent-a-Car Sys., Inc. v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. TireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Frederick v. Sun 1031, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Budget Rent-A-Car Systems v. BridgestoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- New Mexico Public Schools Insurance Authority v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.