Legal Opinion
Baker Driveaway Co. v. Hamilton
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1939No. 208PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is an application for an interlocutory injunction to enjoin the defendants from enforcing Section 1033(c) of the Act of the Pennsylvania Legislature of 1937, P.L. 2329, as amended June 27, 1939, Act No. 400, 75 P.S. § 642(c), on the ground that this legislation violates the Constitution of the United States. The acts in question prohibit the operation on the highways of Pennsylvania of vehicles carrying an automobile over the cab of the carrier vehicle.
The plaintiffs allege that they operate 756 vehicles of the prohibited type, valued at $1,066,235.90, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maurer v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Moffett v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Davega-City Radio, Inc. v. BolandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Hentschel v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camacho v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Chirillo v. LehmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
- Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.