Legal Opinion
Maurer v. Boardman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1939No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Babnes,
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the enforcement of Section 1033(c) which was added to the Vehicle Code by the Act of June 29, 1937, P. L. 2329, 2401. This act forbids the operation upon the highways of this Commonwealth of a vehicle carrying an automobile over the cab or head of the operator of the carrier vehicle. Its provisions became effective upon the approval of the act by the Governor on June 29, 1937, but the granting of a preliminary injunction in the court below has resulted in postponing the date of enforcement: The defendants are the Secretary of Revenue, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Maurer v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Plowman v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Leopold W. Mahler and Helen E. Mahler, His Wife, and Bertha Ebertsheim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.