Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Railroad Commission
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Consolidated Freightways, Inc., seeks to enjoin defendant, the Railroad Commission of the State of California, from enforcing its order directing plaintiff to cease and desist from charging and collecting rates less than the minimum imposed for the transportation of property in the City and County of San Francisco' by defendant, pursuant to the City Carriers’ Act of California, Stats.1935, Ch. 312, p, 1057, as amended, Deering’s General Laws, Act 5134. Plaintiff’s deliveries which are the subject of this litigation, consist of local transportation of pool car…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Marin Mun. Water Dist. v. N. Coast Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
- Chain Locations of America, Inc. v. East Hudson Parkway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954