Ellen S. v. Katlyn F.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The defendant, Katlyn F., appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the application for a civil protection order filed by the plaintiff, Ellen S. 1 The defendant claims that the court improperly determined "that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant had stalked the plaintiff and would continue to do so in the absence of an order of protection." We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts. On January 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed an application for an order of civil protection against the defendant. In her application, she…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hirschfeld v. MACHINISTSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Stechel v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. ELECKSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C.A. v. G.L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Rose B. v. DawsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017