Legal Opinion

LENOIR FINANCE COMPANY v. Currie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1961No. 449PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

W. A. Johnson, successor in office to defendant Currie, was, on motion of the State, substituted as defendant.

The legislative power to tax is limited only by constitutional provisions. Sec. 3, Art. V of our Constitution imposes the duty to tax in a just and equitable manner. It further provides: “Taxes on property shall be uniform as to each class of property taxed.” Specific authority is given to tax trades, professions, franchises, and incomes. Literally the requirement of uniformity is confined to taxes on property, but repeated judicial interpretations extend this requirement to license,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Armour Packing Co. v. LacySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Great American Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Appeal of Springmoor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Rigby v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API