Legal Opinion

Providence Health System Oregon v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2015No. 1000400, 1000401; A149021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLHEIM, S. J.

Providence Health System (Providence) filed a petition for reconsideration, requesting the court to “clarify” three aspects of our decision regarding an order, under ORS 656.325(1), suspending claimant’s compensation for an express period of time. In addition, Providence requests that we correct a mistake in the citation to a subsection of an administrative rule and the description of a statute. We allow the petition for reconsideration. We correct the mistake in the citation to the administrative rule and the description of a statute, but otherwise adhere to our opinion.

Our…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Providence Health System v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Walker v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Labor Ready v. MogensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Zach v. Chartis Claims, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Alvarado-Depineda v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Providence Health System Oregon v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API