Brendan Dassey v. Michael Dittmann
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Dissent
WOOD, Chief Judge, and ROVNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges,
dissenting.
Psychological coercion, questions to which the police furnished the answers, and ghoulish games of “20 Questions,” in which Brendan Dassey guessed over and over again before he landed on the “correct” story (i e., the one the police wanted), led to the “confession” that furnished the only serious evidence supporting his murder conviction in the Wisconsin courts. Turning a blind eye to these glaring faults, the en banc majority has decided to deny Dassey’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. They justify this travesty of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.