Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Goar

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1993No. 06A01-9304-CV-139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

The unique question we address today is whether a jury can determine if an action is frivolous and attorney’s fees are warranted under IND.CODE 34-l-32-l(b) (Supp. 1992). We hold that a court must make such determinations. Appellant-plaintiffs Jack R. O’Neill and Letti O’Neill appeal the jury’s award of costs and attorney fees to appellee-defendant James V. Goar d/b/a Goar Associates. We reverse the judgment and remand.

FACTS

The undisputed facts are that in July 1991, Phyllis Jackson signed a listing agreement with Goar to sell her house. The list price was $115,000. Goar showed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Calhoun v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Greensburg Local 761 Printing Specialities v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Indiana Republican State Committee v. SlaymakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API