O'Neill v. Goar
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
The unique question we address today is whether a jury can determine if an action is frivolous and attorney’s fees are warranted under IND.CODE 34-l-32-l(b) (Supp. 1992). We hold that a court must make such determinations. Appellant-plaintiffs Jack R. O’Neill and Letti O’Neill appeal the jury’s award of costs and attorney fees to appellee-defendant James V. Goar d/b/a Goar Associates. We reverse the judgment and remand.
FACTS
The undisputed facts are that in July 1991, Phyllis Jackson signed a listing agreement with Goar to sell her house. The list price was $115,000. Goar showed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kahn v. CundiffIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Calhoun v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Greensburg Local 761 Printing Specialities v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Indiana Republican State Committee v. SlaymakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000