M. C. Kiser Co. v. Rosenbloom
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The court did not err in granting the nonsuit. The evidence disclosed without dispute that the agreement was not in writing and that the other *187facts were such as to render the statute of frauds applicable. We think the ease is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Denmead v. Glass, 30 Ga. 637 (2), in which it was held that the delivery of goods to a carrier is not a delivery to the purchaser within the meaning of that provision of the statute which refers to the sale of goods to the amount of more than $50, where the buyer has not accepted and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Dudley v. IslerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Walker & Rogers v. Malsby Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Brunswick Grocery Co. v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Marks & Powell v. Talmadge's Sons & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cofer v. WOFFORD OIL CO. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Schecher v. Shakstad Electric & MacHine Works, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Marshall v. Moultrie Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935