Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Moultrie Cotton Mills

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 9, 1935No. 24945Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

When the decision in this case was originally rendered, it was stated that since the general demurrer had been properly sustained, under the rulings made in the preceding divisions of the opinion, the question whether the oral contract would or would not be valid under the statute of frauds, under some new and different form of procedure which might hereafter .be adopted, was not for the court to determine on the present pleadings. However, on the grant of a rehearing, in order more thoroughly to consider the rulings as originally made, the case has been reconsidered in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denmead v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  2. Baer & Son v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. M. C. Kiser Co. v. RosenbloomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API